.{ background: linear-gradient(-45deg, #1ccdd8, #29194f, #1fa6ba, #29194f, #29194f); background-size: 400% 400%; animation: ci-gradient 10s ease infinite; } @keyframes ci-gradient { 0% { background-position: 0% 50%; } 50% { background-position: 100% 50%; } 100% { background-position: 0% 50%; } }
Optioneer report writer

Get a fully traceable report draft the same day your analysis is done.

All data and analysis from Optioneer eventually has to become a document, written up, reviewed, signed off. Report Writer drafts the document straight from real-world data, in line with your own custom template, specifically for the audience it's actually going to. What used to take a team of SMEs days of data collection and coordination now takes minutes to draft.

Custom reports ready in just a few clicks

Built on Optioneer's existing data structure, the report starts from an auditable data baseline, not from scratch. Watch the video to learn more.

MacBook

Teams don't need another tool that adds a step. They need a head start. Something that gets the drafting done reliably, on real data, so the SMEs on the project spend their time analysing and discussing rather than crunching data and assembling paragraphs of text.

The problem

Removing the reporting bottleneck.

Infrastructure decisions don't end when the analysis does. They end when someone writes it up, an internal briefing, a decision-supporting document, a board paper, a discipline-specific technical note.

A single report can mean an environmental SME, a cost engineer, a routing specialist and a project lead all contributing their piece, on their own timeline, in their own format, then someone has to reconcile it into one coherent, defensible deliverable.

That documentation and coordination overhead is often slower than the analysis it's reporting on; while solid analysis and decision need time to be thorough, the subsequent deliverable production can be much faster.

Layered report pages labelled baseline, main potential impacts, likely mitigation requirements, residual impacts and overall impact evaluation

Deliverables aren't going anywhere. The time they take should.

Reports, written analysis and decision-support documentation are a permanent feature of infrastructure planning, no platform is going to remove the requirement to produce them. What can change is how long they take and how much of that time is genuinely value-adding.

Optioneer with the analysis comparison table open beside the map, showing option metrics side by sideReport Writer confirming the report plan, listing the metrics and assets the report will draw on

All of your project context, in one place.

Optioneer holds the data and the technology to close that gap. Report Writer is built on the same option data, cost and constraint metrics, and local-impact analysis that powers Optioneer's routing and siting engine, and it extends past routing and siting into the deliverables that data was always going to end up in anyway.

75% less time spent drafting

The slow part, sourcing data, reconciling inputs, writing the first version, collapses from days to minutes.

Built on solid data & metrics

Every figure traces back to an actual Optioneer output: asset placements, route geometry, cost and penalty metrics, constraint interactions.

Auditable

Every claim carries its source, so a reviewer can check it rather than take it on trust.

Customisable

Your templates, your sections, your house style, your audience, not a fixed format imposed on every project.

One engine, with a range of reporting

Customisation is what lets Report Writer cover the full range of documentation a project actually needs. From a single page snapshot to a long form route summary or a detail-heavy appendix.

Optioneer with the Report Writer template library open over a network map of route options
MacBook
Report Writer audience picker, offering role presets such as transmission planning engineer and consenting specialist
Editing the transmission planning engineer audience, setting its grounding sources and output priorities
Report template editor showing the Option summary report structure

Individual impact analysis

EIA-style write-ups for a single receptor: a watercourse, a listed building, a protected landscape. Construction and operational sensitivity, recommended mitigation, evidence-based rationale.

Individual discipline snapshots

A focused technical note for one discipline, cost, ecology, heritage, geotechnical, built to that discipline's own standard and depth.

Comparative analysis across options

Several options laid out side by side against the same criteria, so a review panel or steering group can see the trade-offs at a glance.

Strategic portfolio overview

The whole programme, rolled up: which options are worth taking forward, where the risk concentrates, what the numbers look like in aggregate.

One project's data can feed all four. The same option can produce a two-page screening note today and a comprehensive discipline appendix next month, without redoing the underlying analysis.

How it works

The context is already there. Report Writer isn't a chatbot pointed at a blank page. It's built on Optioneer's existing data structure, so the report starts from a position of understanding, not from scratch.

The data is labelled

Every dataset already knows what it is, environmental designations, cultural heritage, hydrology, ecology, geology, land ownership, with the context that makes it interpretable.

Optioneer map view with labelled constraint data callouts
Optioneer analysis table comparing option metrics

The metrics summarise each option

Cost drivers, penalties, asset counts, terrain, crossings, proximity, constraint breaks, the figures a report is built around exist before the report does.

Local impacts are understood

Not just flagged, not simply that a route crosses a watercourse, but what crossing that watercourse at that point means, sensitivity, likely mitigation, and why it matters here.

Optioneer feature detail panel for a Site of Special Scientific Interest
Optioneer map annotated with project comments and historical land constraints

Your project's own knowledge is in there too

Comments and uploaded files carry what never makes it into a dataset: a client's position, a constraint found on site, a decision made three months ago, and why.

Then you make three decisions

01

Pick the audience

A screening note for a GIS team and a full assessment for a planning authority are different documents. Say which one you're writing.

02

Pick the template

Your sections, your house style, your structure, including whichever of the four report types above fits the deliverable.

03

Review the plan

Before a word is written, you see what Report Writer intends to produce, and you can change it.

And then it happens

The report drafts section by section, from real project data, cited and traceable back to the dataset, layer, or guidance document behind each claim. Optioneer's own maps, metrics tables and comparisons can be pulled straight into the document rather than rebuilt by hand. Where something genuinely isn't in the project, Report Writer goes and finds it; where it can't be found at all, it says so plainly.

MacBook
“An estimate of the percentage of the work covered through these documents would be 100% of the route summary and 60% of an options assessment report.”
Project Manager
at a utility serving 4 million customers

Ready to see it on your own projects?

Report Writer is rolling out to early-access customers. Speak to your Continuum contact to arrange a trial or a live demo on one of your own projects.

Client success stories

We’ve had the pleasure of working with global leaders in the utilities industry, find out how they achieved results with Optioneer.